Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Perspective
Monday, October 25, 2010
Unit Alternatives Point
Basic shapes are extremely important in everything. They are so simplistic, but when they are played with and altered from the original form, can turn into something very interesting. This is true not only in the Cathedrals we saw, but in other buildings as well. The Chateau Chambord is a nice illustration of this idea. On the bottom, Roman influence in seen everywhere your eyes travel. This is pure, simplistic shapes. On the top though, what you can see from far away, shows the gothic, the newer architecture. Putting them both together though, is a statement all its own. This takes what has already been done and (here’s that word again) alters them into something that has a completely different meaning than before, when they were used originally.
Shapes continued again along with stacking at the end of this unit when we discussed the Palazzo Medici. I learned from class and outside, how this was a nice transition to the reflections unit. First of all, the home defined society and its movements quite well. The most vivid example was how there were three floors or layers to the building. Each one served a different purpose and you could tell that by the stones, the material used for the structure. The stones at the bottom were very rough, where the peddlers and servants (working class were) but as you traveled heaven wards, the stones were smoother and more refined, as were the people. This elevated process showed that refinement or alteration was on its way!
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Reading Comprehension 4
Reading Comprehension 5
During the beginning of the Renaissance, architecture and design were transitioning from the Middle Ages where private spaces were sparse. This affected artifacts as well, like the candlestick. It began as purely simplistic, made out of iron, brass, and other materials, not having decorative features. It was used for light mobility purposes, since the interiors were fairly dark.
The times flowed into the Rococo experience, which is hardly considered a style phase, except towards interiors and accessories. The candlesticks definitely went with the flow of this and evolved more. These newer ones were smaller, curvilinear, and more naturalistic than those of the Baroque or Renaissance before it.
If we were to travel a few more years up the road to the present day, the candlesticks are almost obsolete. We have candles, but not to deliver light to carry around. They are more for the aroma they give off. We do have a modern day candlestick, which I think is much safer; you won’t get burned! It is the flashlight.
I believe the further you travel in time the more light is needed or wanted within the home. We have advanced our lighting fixtures to the point where we rely on electricity and things that are battery-operated. We are continuing to expound more and more on technology that soon we might do away with the candle all together. We have done so already, at least with its original intent, to provide light.
http://blog.aurorahistoryboutique.com/images/early-1800s-fashion-2.png
The fashion changed dramatically during the 19th century. At the beginning of this century, the dresses were padded, had fluff, and corsets (much like the architecture). Then they came to be about the moral beliefs at the time; being formed more to the body, but graceful and light. People were in general more open and free, not bogged down as they were before. It was influenced, some say, by nature, but was all together meant to be more visually appealing than before. It became easier for goods and ideas to travel across the sea and therefore more women were dressing like the English; they received much criticism for that. So even though we were an independent country, we still looked like the people we separated from. The women did not know where to turn for new design, so they fell back on the English way. If I would have been there, I would have done my own thing and had a completely different look and style.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Unit Foundation Point
A foundation is the most important aspect of anything that requires continual process and growth. Without one, whatever is coming next will crumble. I believe this with all my heart, which is why I tried my best to learn as much as I could with this unit, so that I could get the most out of the ensuing ones. I appreciated that we began with the definition of stacking and how that presents itself many times throughout this unit. The pyramid is full of the stacking concept. The whole structure is stacking stone upon stone. Along with that, the physical exertion of climbing to the top represents the difficulty of rising up the social ladder, a near impossibility during this time. These pyramids established the axes; horizontal and vertical. The horizontal illustrates the life cycle here on earth and the vertical axis relates to the relationship between earth and gods. During this time the Egyptians believed the earth had four corners. The gold that adorned the top of the pyramid threw the light down each of the four corners, traveling to the ends of the earth. I thought of this concept again with my Eiffel Tower project in studio. The structure is actually positioned so that the points are at each North, South, West, and East. I wonder if Gustave Eiffel pulled from this same idea (concept?) when designing the placement of the Tower. I really saw how male and female concepts were attributed to architecture this early in history. I felt that this idea was apparent wherever you turned beginning in Egypt, continuing with the Grecians and then the Romans (the wu-wu!). I am excited to learn if this is incorporated within the next centuries. We learned as well that there were three ingredients that are always included within architecture; these are a porch, court, and hearth. I have seriously debated these over the course of the last few weeks and it is true! They really are an integral part of architecture! What really astounded me when we traveled to Greece was their sense of detail. In everything they did, nothing was forgotten. Every jot and tittle were thought about and made important. Where this made an impact for me was at Athens. The Parthenon is such a significant feat. The columns here were not placed exactly the same distance apart. They had slight variations between them so that the distance looked the same when seen from the entrance into Athens. Also they were not perfectly plumb either. If they were extended above the framework of the structure, they would all meet at a point 1.5 miles above the temple stylobate. I cannot believe someone actually thought about these things and then proceeded to carry them out. Absolutely amazing. Hall states why such care exercised for this building: “…arĂȘte, for the home of the goddess required the most excellent materials and most exacting workmanship. It was done because the Greeks could do it.” He goes on to say that yes, the structure is now in ruins, but not by fault of construction. It was all to do with human calamity. Of the ten structures presented to us, included in the cities around Rome, I realized that I could not choose just one I appreciated the most because they are all integral parts of this time period. I look forward to seeing many more of the themes we learned in the following segments: stacking, male and female, elements and principles of design, three ingredients of architecture, and sense of detail.
Friday, October 1, 2010
First Project
Reading Comprehension 3
[1] Look at http://www.uncg.edu/~pllucas/Gothic%20Cathedrals/website%2003.31.08/timelineNEW.html to find the questions. Great graphics!
The architect had high ambitions for Florence Cathedral. If the physical collapse of the building really meant the failure of the church as well, there was pressure to make sure this went according to plan. The people that were a part of this process wanted to see the Church and Christianity rise again. They played a vital role towards the church eventually becoming an integral part of society by continuing to design and reevaluate again and again to make the cathedrals the best. This design included commodity, firmness, and delight. Those that go to church today in huge structures want them to look pretty and be able to accommodate the needs of the congregation. As far as lessons learned, we need to make sure ten times over that our designs can withstand.
Cologne Cathedral is much like Amiens, especially to the plan and height as well as with the flying buttresses and the two towers. The one thing that is different though, is the spires that are entirely Germanic in style. This shows there is a slight variance between the two region styles. All of the similarities unite them together but the small different details make them unique. I feel that the number of towers go back to the male and female concept. With two, you walk through the middle of the towers, which could also signify insignificance while as with one, could signal importance.
The Salisbury Cathedral was able to be built however long or wide the architect wanted because there was nothing preventing it to be so. They were able to have free rein; to not have to be concerned about fitting in with the area around it. I think Amiens was stuck inside this town and it was then the designer’s problem to figure out how it would look best. Salisbury makes more of a statement and is much more regal and majestic because of its landscaping, whereas Amiens is a part of the city.
[2] This illustration from A Medieval Home Companion depicts woman at work in a medieval interior. Unfortunately, the image is closely cropped so we don’t see much of the rest of the dwelling in which she works. Using Harwood and Roth, complete the rest of the scene using words and images to demonstrate your understanding of the domestic medieval interior.
These spaces were not as grand as the cathedrals by any means. As this image shows what looks to be the kitchen, it would probably be less decorative than any other part of the home. The interior of a secular dwelling would have the following: much color, decorated with hangings on the wall, and had (if any) box-shaped furniture. There would have been a patterned stone floor, small diamond-pane casement windows, a wood beamed ceiling, and a large stone mantel. The image I am including is from Harwood and depicts a kitchen, though this one does have a good deal of furniture.